CyberGhost vs PureVPN
PureVPN is the direct comparison point for CyberGhost's un-quantified “streaming-optimized servers” claim — PureVPN explicitly lists its streaming servers per platform, which CyberGhost does not.
Side-by-side
| Factor | CyberGhost | PureVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Streaming-optimized servers | Yes, but count not published | Yes — explicitly listed per platform (Netflix, Hulu, etc.) |
| P2P/torrenting servers | Yes — P2P-optimized servers (features page) | Yes — dedicated P2P servers, also explicitly listed |
| Speed protocol | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 | WireGuard supported, historically slower reputation, improved in recent years |
| Price (best long-term plan) | $2.19/mo (26-mo plan, billed $56.94 upfront) | Budget-tier, roughly comparable to CyberGhost's intro rate |
| Simultaneous devices | 7 | 10 |
| Free plan | ✗ No | ✗ No — 7-day trial for a small fee |
Where CyberGhost wins
CyberGhost has a longer, more established public track record and a broader named list of general streaming platforms (40+) than PureVPN typically markets.
Where PureVPN has the edge
PureVPN's willingness to explicitly list which servers are optimized for which platform is exactly the transparency CyberGhost's own streaming-server claim lacks — useful if you want to verify “streaming-optimized” before you buy rather than take the claim on faith.
Choose CyberGhost for a broader named platform list and more established track record. Choose PureVPN if you specifically want a provider that discloses which servers are optimized for which streaming service.